
Yeah so, Globalism/Globalization, not happening for now. I kinda need a break from that economic mess.
**
So, today I finally watched the (above depicted) documentary with Bill Maher- Religulous and it was quite a thought provoking, albeit not surprising, doc on people and religion(s). I half expected it to be one long tongue-in-cheek, skewed, film and while naturally some of it was, it really did something interesting: ask the hard (but seemingly easy) questions and show you what these people - of all walks of life - actually think.
Of course he does resort to his criticisms and sarcasm, but with some of the responses people had (including a member of Congress) it's a little bit hard not to, so it's forgivable. I'm not going to sit here and review the film, however, because I think it's more important to talk about the content than anything. A few things stood out to me:
According to some statistics presented (and I outright admit, I could not possible be a bigger skeptic of any statistic like this) in the film, it purports that there are approximately 1 billion Islamic faithful in the world - 1 billion! The world's population is approximately 6.76 billion. Similarly, Christianity is estimated to have approximately 2.1 billion. Realistically it's impossible to ever actually know and these numbers really only just that, but the thought itself of those numbers in comparison to the worlds population is overwhelming. What is surprising (in the prior link) is that the next largest group is *drum roll* Non-Believers at 1.1 billion.
While none of this (except the size of Non-believers) should be shocking at all, I don't think I have ever actually looked at a realistic numbers regarding the population of these religions (and sects therein). It's astounding to think that when combining those estimations, close to half of the worlds population is devoted to these two theologies alone. Neither should really be surprising when you consider the reign of both the Roman and Ottoman Empire's which had an immeasurable influence on religion at their respective times, but still, I somehow never fully imagined the numbers being so high, especially for Islam.
First, I want to touch on the Islamic faith, which I have almost always strayed away from due to mostly ignorance to the full-scope of the religion. Admittedly, I am no more educated on it than I have ever been, but there are facets of it which I feel I can more easily identify and speak of without having to even partially understand the religion (and of course each individual sect's practices). Even without a vast understanding though, I feel that Islamic religions are quite possibly the most insidious of all the major religions.
I don't necessarily mean that as an insult against the Islamic faithful, but it's a religion which has largely let the time pass it by and is sickeningly oppressive, not to mention in a lot of ways, tyrannical. But more importantly and quite visibly, it is unbelievably oppressive to women and in some sects, forces them to live as dehumanized objects. Although in some ways, they have gotten past the oppression of women, the practices on an individual level in many ways have not changed very much. Also, it should be noted that Benazir Bhutto was assassinated in 2007, it's semi-safe to assume that it probably partly had to do with her gender.
I do understand that not all Islamic sects are oppressive to women in those kinds of radical ways, but the real problem is that it still exists and when considering the size of the overall religion, I have to imagine that probably greater than 20-30% of the religion total still practices in such a way. The atrocities these women face are unimaginable, including but not limited to physical/mental abuse and rape. Some might argue it's also the culture, but religion is intrinsic in cultures even to those who do not necessarily practice the religion. It's not to suggest that this does not occur in society as a whole or within other religious cultures either, just to be clear, but that does not make it any less real in Islamic culture(s) either.
Moreover, many religions have practices which are minimally demanding, the best example being many Christian sects, which largely "require" an individual to attend services/institutions weekly (Saturday or Sunday) and otherwise you live your life as you wish. But Islam requires daily prayer and very specific hygienic (nothing against that, either) practices, methods to prayer, direction, etc. It's specificity and stringent requirements on a daily basis, I feel alone, are what make it tyrannical as much as anything else. The amount of devotion it requires is unbelievable and by my estimation, unreasonable.
But what has ultimately been created or manifested within it is something that has come to threaten the world and others within its stronghold. Israel is constantly threatened by its Islamic neighbors both near and far (I assure you, that is not a defense of Israel), religious sects within the the Middle-East which differ from one another and has also spilled over abroad. There is a lot of hostility surrounding this particular religion and the monster in the belly of it all has generated a level of extremism to an extent that is relatively unseen in much of the world (religiously based).
What's most concerning, beyond the humanitarian atrocities within it, is how far-reaching this violence has been and the threat it poses to parts of the world. What strikes me about it the most is the reality within it all that there is the potential for a situation of Nazi Germany type proportions on a world-wide scale. Firstly, if you don't think September 11th has had anything to do with our current economic standing, you're ignorant and blind. Yes, our own inherent and unique American-brand greed has much to do with it, but the wrench they threw into the gears on that fateful day ultimately created the instability that made us fall flat on our faces. On a global scale, with the right planning and even with a reckless execution (but execution nonetheless) they could cripple many nations in this world in such a way that a greater rise in power is not out of the question.
I don't think it's just an American hatred, I think it's an intolerance of anyone who does not see the world as they do and frankly, that's a recipe for disaster. Furthermore, when you consider that A) Not all Islamic people are bad or ascribe the radicalism, B) There is little-to-no differentiating between good and bad in the long run and C) Their overall visibility as an entity, in many ways, is very low (compared to swastikas, grandiose public events and a very outspoken fuhrer ). Understandably the immediate thought process here would be, "Well, what about Iran? There seems to be obvious concern there." That's not entirely wrong, in some ways they are a threat, but I think the threat is more deeply rooted in the religion than it is the political entity that is Iran. If something of that nature were to occur, I do feel that Iran would likely become a factor in it, without question. But the threat of Iran, to me, seems more reasonably local: Instability and the vulnerability of Iraq and increasingly Pakistan and the fact Iran has been licking its chops at the possibility of destabilizing and destroying Israel. On that front, yes, they are a threat. But on a global scale, it's the pockets of extremism and the looming potential that such a domineering and tyrannical religion could even be the catalyst for those not involved to be influenced into a fight for power.
Like I said, it might be reaching, but it's also not entirely unrealistic either. This isn't "the terrorists" this is something much, much larger and much more devastating to the world at-large and we're all powerless to stop it because of the aforementioned examples.
********************************************************
Another facet of this film which was incredible, was the mentality that so many shared in their responses to question of dinosaurs, the age of the world, evolution. There are others, but I will stick to those for the sake of brevity.
So many of the responses were just as ignorant and narrow-minded as you could ever imagine; the rationale, the absolute certainty, the defensive manner in which some responded to serious questions and counter-points. That is my biggest quarrel with religion in general, the inhibition of free-thought, the way in which people believe so firmly and unwaveringly in a book, a compilation of doctrines which span millennia and bow to a man, Jesus, who never even set out to create another religion. Paul, some 60 years later, created the Pauline Church. The blind devotion and unwillingness to compromise on almost any level, is unfathomable. The absolute refutation of anything which, equally refutes by either conceptualization or empirical proof, their beliefs, their book or their god, imprisons the mind and has inhibited America from progressing in more ways than we can imagine. Say what you will, but 8 years of George W. Bush, can almost certainly be attributed to the ignorance and infectiousness of religiosity and the ultimate goal of imposing their beliefs on the entire nation as a whole.
The creationist museum is easily the best example used in the movie, this is a museum which outright repudiates evolution and despite hard-line empirical proof of the contrary, depicts man sharing the Earth with dinosaurs. People actually believe this, simply because the bible makes no reference to the contrary and there is some kind of loose reference to dinosaurs on Noah's Arc. Meanwhile, even Pope John Paul II supported evolution much to the chagrin of Christians, whom still did not accept it (as evidenced by a multi-million dollar museum dedicated to strongly suggest otherwise).
Beyond all of my frustrations with religion and my utter disdain for it all, it's truly disheartening that people are so bound by it, especially when it comes to the actual answers to the questions we have. The most important point both implicit and partially explicit in the film is probably what makes it greatest of all: doubt. So many of these people have no doubts, they don't care to question but merely follow these concepts, beliefs and ideas, never thinking or wanting to hear otherwise. To limit yourself to a single school of thought is to deprive yourself, for a lifetime, of the true fruits in the wealthy garden of knowledge that this life affords us from the Earth we inhabit, to the night skies of endless possibilities and not necessarily any right answers.
If you want to be religious, if you want to believe in god, that's your prerogative and your unalienable, natural right as an intelligent being. But the emphasis here is intelligent. We don't have to agree on the existence of god because to each his/her own, but religion does nothing but enslave humanity to a book (or books) and wastes a lifetime in its constraints, instead of allowing people to ask their own questions and find the answers for themselves, defining themselves, their lives, their perceptions and not being handed a prescription for instant retardation.
I shouldn't care, but people's complete stupidity and ignorance appalls me to a point that I can't help but talk about it.
